CSC enters turnaround mode

Just a couple weeks into his new job, Computer Sciences Corp.’s CEO Mike Lawrie described a troubled company that is beginning a “significant turnaround effort.”

The company’s revenue is flat – a positive in this environment – but profitability is down because of problems with certain projects including a troubled project with the United Kingdom National Health Service contract, company officials said in an analyst call April 11.

“The business is significantly under performing,” Lawrie said. “We do have significant challenges but clearly it can be fixed.”

Among the issues he has identified are profitability from projects that were either won by bidding too low or have had performance issues.

Also, the market has significantly shifted but CSC has not moved quickly enough to higher value offerings, he said.

“Internally, the operating model is overly complex and lacks accountability,” Lawrie said. “The cost structure also doesn’t match the reality of business today.”

CSC also has not done a good job of integrating its acquisitions over the years, he said.

“There is significant work ahead and there will be restructuring going forward,” Lawrie said.

He plans to establish a leaner operation with clearer lines of accountability. “Needless to say there will be some leadership changes as we move forward,” he said.

Unprofitable contracts also will either need to be fixed or renegotiated, he said.

Lawrie did point out positives at the company including its public-sector business, software products, intellectual property and geographic presence. The company also continues to build its pipeline of new business.

By mid- to late summer, CSC will be able to lay out more concrete steps for the turnaround and the “metrics we will use to hold me and the management team accountable,” he said.

About the Author

Nick Wakeman is the editor-in-chief of Washington Technology. Follow him on Twitter: @nick_wakeman.

Reader Comments

Tue, Apr 17, 2012

CSC's constant reduction of experienced skilled personnel and "replaced" my low experience, lower cost personnel have helped to make some unprofitable contracts less of a financial burden but it certainly has not impressed the true clients, the people that depend on CSC for service. The client CIO may have been satisfied though by the cost reduction. CSC isn't the only outsourcing company that has tried this solution. When the client considers a contractor for some new business, they look at what has happened over the years with their existing contract.

Mon, Apr 16, 2012

Mike Lawrie is on target on all of the points that he made. CSC is (has been) so hungry to win new business that they under proce their bid to get the business. There is so much overhead in the comapny that it makes it nearly impossible for the company to be profitable without restructuring. CSC did the right thing to bring in an outsider.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts

  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Sequestration, LPTA and the Top 100

    Join Washington Technology’s Editor-in-Chief Nick Wakeman as he analyzes the annual Top 100 list and reveals critical insights into how market trends have impacted its composition. You'll learn what movements of individual companies means and how the market overall is being impacted by the current budget environment, how the Top 100 rankings reflect the major trends in the market today and how the biggest companies in the market are adapting to today’s competitive environment. Learn More!