Close this Advertisement




Share

Oracle settlement of false claim lawsuit could top $200M

Software provider agrees to pay record GSA settlement

In what will shape up to be the largest False Claims Act settlement ever collected by the General Services Administration, software maker Oracle Corp. and Oracle America will pay $199.5 million plus interest to the agency, according to a Justice Department Oct. 6 news release.

At issue is a contractual obligation that the company failed to meet relating to a 1998 agreement with GSA for Oracle to sell software licenses and technical support to government entities via GSA's Multiple Awards Schedule program.

The settlement is a result of the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act by which citizens can file lawsuits on behalf of the government and share in any financial gains. The Justice Department joined the lawsuit in July 2010.

As a result, whistleblower and former Oracle employee Paul Frascella will receive $40 million as his portion of the settlement.  

The settlement contends that "Oracle knowingly failed to meet its contractual obligations to provide GSA with current, accurate and complete information about its commercial sales practices, including discounts offered to other customers, and that Oracle knowingly made false statements to GSA about its sales practices and discounts," according to the DOJ statement.

In addition, the government alleges that it paid more than it should have for Oracle products because the company did not disclose discounts it passed on to commercial customers when they were higher than the discounts that Oracle had disclosed to GSA.

Tony West, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department's Civil Division, said practices like these undermine the integrity of the procurement process. It creates "an unfair advantage against the majority of companies that are playing by the rules," he said.

Oracle did not return calls to Washington Technology, but a company spokeswoman told the Federal Times in an email that "strong controls" would have insured government customers received fair prices and added that Oracle decided to settle to "avoid the distraction and high cost of litigation."

About the Author

Alysha Sideman is the online content producer for Washington Technology.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?
My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?
Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH

Trending

Webcasts

  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Surviving Lowest Price Technically Acceptable IT Projects: Maximize your Returns and Customer Satisfaction Ratings

    Register for this FREE exclusive roundtable webcast to hear from Nick Wakeman, Editor of Washington Technology, Shamun Mahmud, Cloud Security Architect, DLT Solutions and Paul McCloskey, Federal Alliances Leader, SolarWinds, and they discuss the different approaches on how you can deliver low cost, technically excellent, better value solutions to meet the fiscal and technology needs of today’s government, while still maximizing your returns on your LPTA IT projects. Learn More!