Lockheed and NASA set sights, budget on Mars and beyond

Gravitational pull may not be as strong as budget contraints

 Lockheed Martin Corp. will continue to attempt to boldly go where no man – or company – has gone before, into deep space on board the Orion spacecraft. And do it within budget.

NASA has designated the Orion as the Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV) and announced May 24 that Lockheed Martin will continue to work closely with the space agency to achieve initial crewed operations by 2016.

The Orion/MPCV spacecraft was designed to serve as the nation’s next-generation spacecraft to take humans far beyond low Earth orbit to multiple destinations throughout our solar system.

Meanwhile, Lockheed Martin will continue working to develop the MPCV, NASA said. The spacecraft will carry four astronauts for 21-day missions and be able to land in the Pacific Ocean off  the California coast. It is designed to be 10 times safer during ascent and entry than its predecessor, the space shuttle, the space agency said.

A pressure test on the Orion/MPCV crew module was successful completed recently at Lockheed Martin’s Waterton facility in Denver.

NASA’s designation of the Orion crew exploration vehicle will be a sound solution for deep space mission capability within the currently proposed budgets, a Lockheed statement said.

“This path forward will soon enable humans to venture out into the cosmos to explore and study interplanetary destinations never before seen or touched by mankind,” the statement added.

Lockheed said its government-industry teaming is working on affordability initiatives to streamline infrastructure requirements, reduce risk and optimize government-furnished equipment development.

Lockheed Martin Corp., of Bethesda, Md., ranks No. 1 on Washington Technology’s 2010 Top 100 list of the largest federal government contractors.

About the Author

David Hubler is the former print managing editor for GCN and senior editor for Washington Technology. He is freelance writer living in Annandale, Va.

Reader Comments

Thu, May 26, 2011

Sad- just sad. Shuttle was a good concept, leas than well executed, and perhaps too ambitious for the 1970s tech it was built with. But to go back to a mostly-throwaway gumdrop that ends up as an ocean bouy? I realize it is cheaper in the short term, but it isn't progress. I'll be surprised if man gets beyond LEO again, in my lifetime.

Wed, May 25, 2011

> The Orion/MPCV spacecraft was designed to serve as the nation’s next-generation spacecraft to take humans far beyond low Earth orbit to multiple destinations throughout our solar system. You do realize, do you not, that this is utter crap? 21 days gets you around in Earth-Moon space, but nowhere close to Mars or anything else in the solar system. Who writes this stuff?

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
contracts DB


  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More


  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Sequestration, LPTA and the Top 100

    Join Washington Technology’s Editor-in-Chief Nick Wakeman as he analyzes the annual Top 100 list and reveals critical insights into how market trends have impacted its composition. You'll learn what movements of individual companies means and how the market overall is being impacted by the current budget environment, how the Top 100 rankings reflect the major trends in the market today and how the biggest companies in the market are adapting to today’s competitive environment. Learn More!