House members clash over contractor disclosure order

Reps. Issa, Cummings on opposite sides on draft executive order

Arguments over disclosing federal contractors' political contributions heated up a House hearing on May 12 as supporters and opponents clashed over the purpose and possible effects of a recent draft executive order that would require greater transparency for those contributions.

If it becomes final, the order would require more detailed disclosures of political contributions by federal contractors as an adjunct to the procurement process.


Related articles:

Hoyer won't back administration's proposal on political contributions

Contractors required to disclose political contributions


White House officials circulated the draft order as a transparency measure last month. Watchdog organizations support it as a means of obtaining more disclosure on large new categories of corporate political expenditures that were permitted by a Supreme Court decision last year.

Republicans and industry groups quickly raised objections to the draft order, including Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that held the hearing. In recent days, several Democrats have expressed reservations as well.

Rep. Issa alleged that the executive order would “politicize” the procurement process and claimed it would have “a chilling effect on participation and free speech.”

“If the president's proposed executive order is authorized, political donation information would be readily available to political appointees who are immediately involved in the contracting process. That risk is unacceptable,” Issa said in a statement.

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), the senior Democrat on the committee, defended the proposed executive order and released a list of several dozen good government organizations that support it, including Democracy 21, the Project on Government Oversight and Public Citizen.

“Our committee is supposed to enhance transparency,” Cummings said. “I never thought I would see the day when our committee would view transparency as the enemy.”

Cummings said the draft order is consistent with other laws that require disclosing campaign and political contributions and does not affect the procurement process.

Daniel Gordon, administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy at the Office of Management and Budget, said he would limit his comments to the federal procurement issues.

After acknowledging that limitation, Rep. Issa proceeded to question Gordon about whether he believed in free speech and whether the president has a constitutional right to require disclosures from contractors. Gordon answered some of the questions, but he declined to answer others, saying  he is not a constitutional lawyer and did not have that expertise.

Gordon said the political contribution information would not be part of the selection criteria for contracts.

“The contracting officer who is handling that contract will never take into account the political contributions. The question is, does the public have the right to know what contributions are made by contractors?” Gordon said.

Opponents said the order would be burdensome for contractors, especially small businesses. Testifying at the hearing against the proposed order were Alan Chvotkin, executive vice president of the Professional Services Council, and Mark Renaud, a partner at the Wiley Rein LLP law firm.



Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts

  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Sequestration, LPTA and the Top 100

    Join Washington Technology’s Editor-in-Chief Nick Wakeman as he analyzes the annual Top 100 list and reveals critical insights into how market trends have impacted its composition. You'll learn what movements of individual companies means and how the market overall is being impacted by the current budget environment, how the Top 100 rankings reflect the major trends in the market today and how the biggest companies in the market are adapting to today’s competitive environment. Learn More!