PSC tells wartime contracting panel to take wider view of relief operations

A professional business organization is criticizing a legislative contracting panel for using a narrow lens to examine the broad issue of delivering aid in battle zones.

Professional Services Council President and CEO Stan Soloway, a Washington Technology contributor, sent a letter to the Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan advising it “not to look for answers to broad questions about development in contingency operations only through a single aperture, but to approach these issues holistically.”

The independent, bipartisan eight-member commission was created by the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 2008 to study federal contracting for the reconstruction, logistical support of coalition forces and performance of security functions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Soloway sent his letter as the commission was preparing to hold a hearing April 11 to gain insight from nongovernmental organizations on contingency operations and the role of NGOs in relief efforts.

Several members of the commission had spoken with NGO representatives while in Afghanistan about how their organizations operate impartially and with the intent of letting the Afghan people carry on the services after the NGO leaves. They also wrote a how-to white paper on relief work. The paper and those talks led to the hearing.

Soloway said there are other experts beyond nonprofit groups that could offer insights.

“Include in your field of vision the hard-earned insights of the full community of development experts, including the for-profit development firms,” he advised.

In response, the commission said it believes it has not left the business community out of its meetings and hearings and that it brought the NGOs in for their perspective on issues.

“The hearing with the NGOs focused on their white paper and was not intended to be a full review of development contracting,” said Michael Thibault, co-chairman of the commission and deputy director of the Defense Contract Audit Agency from 1973 to 2005, in reaction to Soloway’s letter.

“Our more than 900 meetings around the country and overseas have included numerous talks with contractor officials, including members of the Professional Services Council,” he said, noting that private, for-profit contractors have also testified before the commission.

The commission's final report, with recommendations on how to improve contingency contracting operations, is due to Congress in July.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts

  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Sequestration, LPTA and the Top 100

    Join Washington Technology’s Editor-in-Chief Nick Wakeman as he analyzes the annual Top 100 list and reveals critical insights into how market trends have impacted its composition. You'll learn what movements of individual companies means and how the market overall is being impacted by the current budget environment, how the Top 100 rankings reflect the major trends in the market today and how the biggest companies in the market are adapting to today’s competitive environment. Learn More!