Mike Daconta

COMMENTARY

Why IBM's Watson is good news for government

Approach to ‘Jeopardy!’ questions could help admins with their daily grand challenges

As a hardcore geek, it was exciting for me to watch Watson, a supercomputer named after IBM’s founder Thomas Watson, recently dominate its human competitors on “Jeopardy!”  In deference to the “Terminator” generation, my son took the side of the humans and was a bit offended that I was rooting for the computer.

More importantly than answering trivia questions and putting aside fears that artificially intelligent (AI) computers will make us all slaves, what Watson achieved represents another milestone and possibly a watershed event for government IT in general and information management in particular. To understand why, we need to first understand what innovations the IBM Research team, led by David Ferrucci, achieved and then extrapolate how they can be applied to pressing government challenges.

For a computer to compete at the highest levels of “Jeopardy!”, it must understand the question, search its knowledge base and deliver an answer in approximately six seconds. Candidates can only press the buzzer after Alex Trebek has finished reading the question.


Related coverage:

IBM's Jeopardy! match much more than game playing

IBM’s Watson vs. the human brain: Tale of the tape

Watson heads for medical school


By researching IBM’s websites on Watson and the DeepQA project and watching Nova’s excellent documentary titled Smartest Machine On Earth,” I learned that Watson achieved this feat using a pipelined approach.

  • Use natural-language processing (NLP) to parse the sentence and extract keywords.
  • Use information retrieval techniques against structured and unstructured data sources to create candidate answers.
  • Use rules and logic to winnow down the field of candidates.
  • Use machine learning techniques to score the candidates.
  • Deliver the highest scoring candidate as the answer.

Although that description significantly simplifies the hundreds, if not thousands, of nontrivial innovations delivered by this research team, we can correlate those major pipeline stages to specific systemic information management problems that every government organization faces. And it’s refreshing to see such a pragmatic, hybrid approach to solving this problem rapidly — in a span of three years — in contrast to the plodding, linear progress that more traditional AI techniques had demonstrated in the past two decades. That is not a condemnation of those techniques, just another confirmation that “perfect is the enemy of the good.”

There are many grand challenges in every field. But in government information management, there is one that stands above all others: information overload. And information overload has three subchallenges: poor data quality, poor knowledge modeling and poor precision.

Watson’s pipelined, pragmatic process demonstrated significant innovations that overcame all of those challenges. That should inspire both hope and excitement in the government IT community.

Let’s examine each subchallenge and Watson’s solution.

To deal with poor data quality, Watson uses information retrieval techniques on curated data sources to develop its list of possible candidate answers. Wolfram Alpha also extensively uses the same technique of carefully curating data. As a foundational technique, government agencies must institute data quality programs or their data foundation will be unreliable and unsuitable for higher-order information management functions.

Second, Watson used rules and logic to winnow the candidates. That requires government agencies to go beyond data modeling to embrace the semantic techniques of knowledge modeling — also known as ontology development — to enable robust rules and logical inferences.

Finally, Watson used machine learning to select its final answer. That is one solution — among others, even mundane ones such as data standardization — to improving the precision and relevance of government information retrieval. Though not suitable in all domains, machine learning holds significant promise for knowledge domains we cannot model well.

Watson is truly good news for every government IT professional because it demonstrates real progress on these grand challenges and holds real promise in overcoming information overload.

Reader Comments

Tue, Aug 2, 2011 James

When will a version of Watson be capable of participating or adding context to the televised political debates? This would be a tremendous leap forward. Watson would have the information to fact check what the candidates were claiming in their speeches. Currently I see huge lies, false logic, false belief systems, half truths, going totally unchallenged. Exposing the lies and false beliefs in government and politics would improve this country in many ways.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts

  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Sequestration, LPTA and the Top 100

    Join Washington Technology’s Editor-in-Chief Nick Wakeman as he analyzes the annual Top 100 list and reveals critical insights into how market trends have impacted its composition. You'll learn what movements of individual companies means and how the market overall is being impacted by the current budget environment, how the Top 100 rankings reflect the major trends in the market today and how the biggest companies in the market are adapting to today’s competitive environment. Learn More!