Administration hopes for ripple effect from outsourcing policy

Agencies consider which jobs are still suitable for contractors

The Obama administration proposed policy to stop the outsourcing of government-only jobs also will pressure agencies to avoid contracting out work that is closely associated with the government-only work, according to some experts.

"We are examining the mix of work performed by contractors and by federal employees," Jeffrey Zients, chief performance officer and deputy director for management at the Office of Management and Budget, said during a press conference today. "We need to deliver the most effective and efficient government performance possible, and to do so we must recognize the proper role for each sector and draw on their skills appropriately."

RELATED STORIES

The rise of the 'critical function' 

'Inherently governmental' defies quick definition 

OFPP proposes tests for deciding when to outsource work


The administration today released a proposed policy letter on inherently governmental functions, or work that cannot be outsourced to the private sector. The proposal also includes insight from officials on critical functions and work that is closely associated with the jobs only government employee can do. (See related story.)

“A strong workforce is essential to making long-term improvements in our contracting activities,” Zients said.

Since the 1990s officials have concentrated on defining government-only work, but that focus has left out broader issues regarding critical jobs that federal employees should know how to do.

"This narrow focus has been cited as a cause of inadequate attention to maintaining a residual federal core capability when considering contractor performance of critical functions that are tied to an agency’s mission,” the new procurement policy letter states.

The policy letter defines a critical function as work central enough to the agency’s operations that it should be reserved for government employees. The point is to have government employees maintain control of those operations. Moreover, a job is not a critical function if it would not expose an agency to failing its mission if a contractor does the work. Officials say agencies have become too reliant on contractors in recent years and don’t have the in-house know-how to carry out those operations.

Under the new policy document, agency officials would be responsible for ensuring they have enough knowledgeable employees. When deciding about the job, officials must consider their mission, the job’s complexity and the need for special skills, the letter states.

Before issuing a contract solicitation they would have to find if there was enough capability internally to do the work. And after a contract is awarded, agencies have to monitor a contractor’s work, especially work closely associated to inherently governmental functions. They also need to find ways to avoid dependence on contractors to do those jobs and develop strategic employee personnel plans, the letter states.

One industry group said OFPP policy letter is fair and balanced, and doesn’t pick winners and losers.

It’s “founded in sound management strategy rather than ideology,” said Stan Soloway, president and chief executive officers of the Professional Services Council.

“Rather than focus on labels that serve only as code words for desired outcomes, the proposed policy offers a solid foundation on which agencies can make practical and necessary decisions,” he said.

The National Treasury Employee’s Union supports the policy too.

“The bottom line is ensuring that federal employees perform the essential work of government and that agencies have control over their missions and operations,” said Colleen Kelley, the union’s president.

The policy letter is open for comment through June 1.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

Reader Comments

Thu, Apr 15, 2010 Lisa Jackson d.c. area

I have been spending enoungh time on concentrating, and obtaining the straight facts. there are many new faces here, since the Election 2010: and a new agenda.

Thu, Apr 15, 2010

If a function was A-76 in the "80's why can't it be reversed now.

Fri, Apr 2, 2010 Beavercreek OH

based on this only governemnt employees should be working in Iraq and Afganistan -- not contractors. Don't forget: "The point is to have government employees maintain control of those (government) operations. "The agency (the goveernment) (may) would fail its mission if a contractor does the work." "... the government has become too reliant on contractors in recent years and don’t have the in-house know-how to carry out those operations (a war) without contractors." I just know that OPM and the CPO will love replacing the contractors on the battlefield soon.

Fri, Apr 2, 2010

Soloway needs to go. There is no balance to the OFPP document. It is all about the elimination of competition for a wide-swath of work newly defined as inherently governmental, almost inherently governmental and anything an agency mananger calls mission critical.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
 Top 100 Slideshow
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts