DHS undecided about exit portion of US-VISIT program

The department still hasn't decided whether to pursue a biometric program to track when non-U.S. visitors leave via airports

The Homeland Security Department hasn’t decided whether it will pursue a biometric exit system that would electronically collect fingerprints from foreign visitors as they depart from U.S. airports to ensure they leave as required, a senior DHS official said today.

DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano is expected to make a decision on the future of the system after an upcoming review, Rand Beers, undersecretary for DHS’ National Protection and Programs Directorate, told the House Homeland Security Committee.

Beers said the pending review of options for the exit system – that would be part of the department’s U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology (US-VISIT) program – is on Napolitano’s calendar, but he didn’t say when the assessment would happen or when a final decision on the program would be made.

The government already collects fingerprints from non-U.S. visitors when they arrive in the country through the US-VISIT air entry system. However, putting a biometric exit system in place at airports has proved difficult, despite pressure from Congress to do so. Logistical complexities and disputes over who should collect the biometric data and foot the bill — estimated to cost billions during the coming decade — have stymied the program.


Related story:

Exit system for foreign travelers stands at a crossroads


Congress first asked for an automated entry/exit system in 1996. In 2004, the commission that investigated the 2001 terrorist attacks recommended implementing a biometrics-based system. Advocates of such a system say it would boost immigration controls and could bolster counterterrorism efforts, while critics question whether the benefits are worth the cost.

The second Bush administration proposed requiring commercial air carriers to collect exit information at airports, but the plan stalled after it met resistance from the airline industry and some foreign governments. Although the proposal to have airlines collect the data hasn’t been formally scrapped, DHS under the Obama administration seems to be heading in a different direction.

In response to a request from lawmakers, the US-VISIT office recently tested scenarios in which the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency collected fingerprints from non-citizens departing from airports.

Beers told committee members that Napolitano already reviewed the initial findings of the TSA and CBP pilot programs and her upcoming assessment would include answers to questions she had after that initial examination.

Meanwhile, Beers said the Obama administration’s decision not to request funding for the biometric air exit system in its fiscal 2011 budget request for DHS doesn’t mean the department has decided not to pursue the program. Rather, he said, the budget was prepared “in a time sequence which did not allow us to provide an accurate budget estimate for a biometric air exit system.”

In addition, Beers said DHS still has $50 million available for a pilot program that could be used for the program, depending on the department’s a decision on how to proceed. The administration could then request money for the program in its fiscal 2012 budget request, he said.

Reader Comments

Mon, Apr 5, 2010 Chris

This whole thing is absurd. The US and Canada are the only countries in the WORLD yes, WORLD (all of Europe, Asia, Oceania even tiny islands like Tonga and American Samoa do it) that do not have departure immigration control where your passport is checked & Stamped etc. Why is this so? Stop the arguing and build it!

Fri, Mar 26, 2010 cmcginnis12

Soon we wont have any foreign visitors at all. They will go spend there vacations in other countriessimply because we make it so complicated to enter. We are killing our tourist trade because of our poor immigration service. We need immigration reform. I was in the Hotel and Convention business for 20 yrs, trust me, no one will want to bring there family here. Millions of foreign dollars are braught into Florida, but I am affraid it's going to stop as people are afFraid they will be abused by ICE.

Fri, Mar 26, 2010 Observer I

It is astounding how the Executive Branch (can't blame this on Congress or contractors) wasted years, and is still wasting time, finding ever more reasons to bicker, dither and delay. And this causes real danger, as well as permits gazillions of illegal aliens to linger here, which can lead to danger and economic burden. No one is penalized for this gross negligence. Ms. Napol. and her boss, by dithering only 14 months, can buy into, say 10 percent of the blame.

Fri, Mar 26, 2010 dernhbayer

Why is DHS reinventing the wheel? How do the Europeans do it? THEY CHECK PASSPORTS WHEN YOU LEAVE!!!! Just as we have reserved space/terminals for incoming travellers, do the reverse for EXITING passengers. Problem solved. Everyone shows passports, gets checked out, US govt knows if you left or not.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
 Top 100 Slideshow
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts