Justice kicks off planning phase of $1.5B contract

DOJ begins re-compete process for Information Technology Support Services contract

The Justice Department has begun the planning process to re-compete its Information Technology Support Services contract.

This will be the fourth iteration of the contract, which market research firm Input estimates will have a value of $1.5 billion.

In a request for information, DOJ said as many as 15 companies could win spots on the contract. The department will use the RFI to determine the mix of large and small businesses to be placed on the contract.

The winning contractors would compete for task orders to support Justice Department offices and bureaus. “Competition at the task-order level has proven cost-effective, and has yielded significant savings,” the RFI states.

The department said that most DOJ offices have a small staff of computer specialists, systems and programmers to provide IT support. The staffs often are too small to meet demand, and also can lack the expertise to handle all the equipment, operating systems and applications that Justice uses.

A request for proposals could be released in March with awards being made in September, according to Input.

About $440 million in task orders have been awarded so far under the current ITSS contract, which was awarded to 12 companies in 2004. It has a $1 billion ceiling and runs for seven years if all options are exercised, according to Input.

Incumbents on the contract include Keane Inc., which captured about $152 million in business under the contract, the most of any of the 12 contractors, according to Input.

About the Authors

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

Nick Wakeman is the editor-in-chief of Washington Technology. Follow him on Twitter: @nick_wakeman.

Reader Comments

Wed, Oct 21, 2009 BG

OK - it is time for OFPP to step up and take a position on the number of GWACs/MACs etc. that can be serviced through existing GSA contract vehicles - Oh, by the way, aren't we all dealing with the same companies?! Wake up America! OMB/OFPP can't expect industry to take a position here - IT HAS TO BE OMB/OFPP.

Wed, Oct 21, 2009

Mad redundancy and waste because of multiple acquisition vehicles? Would you, as a tax payer, prefer a single vehicle that pretty much guarantees price gauging and monopoly-like poor performance? I guess it comes down to a choice - waste or theft. Pick your poison.

Wed, Oct 21, 2009 M Reston

Goodie! A new IDIQ for IT services. We can all bid again. I'll bet this one looks a lot like Alliant, CIOSP-3, EAGLE 2, ITES-3, etc. So, who is going to step in and stop the mad redundancy and waste? Any leaders out there with the taxpayer in mind?

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
 Top 100 Slideshow
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts