WT Business Beat

By Nick Wakeman

Blog archive
Nick Wakeman

SRA prevails in protest battle with SAIC

The battle between SRA International and Science Applications International Corp. apparently is over as the Government Accountability Office has ruled against SAIC’s bid protest.

I told the story about these two Top 100 companies squaring off over a Military Sealift Command contract in a blog earlier this summer.

SRA was the incumbent on the contract but lost the recompete to SAIC in May 2012. They filed a protest and the command pulled back the award to take a corrective action because of issues with cost evaluations. They issued a new solicitation in August 2012.

This time SRA won the competition and SAIC filed its own protest. Earlier this month GAO rejected SAIC’s protest and the award to SRA stands.

According to the GAO ruling, SAIC objected to the agency’s cost realism evaluation of its proposal. They didn’t like the way the Navy adjusted labor rates and claimed that the Navy didn’t conduct meaningful discussions with respect to SAIC’s costs.

The company also objected to the Navy failing to downgrade SRA’s technical proposal in light of adjustments to SRA’s proposed costs.

“We have considered all of SAIC’s various arguments…and find that none provide a basis on which to sustain the protest,” GAO wrote in its decision.

http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/656953.pdf

So SRA hangs onto its work with a $56.5 million bid, which the Navy adjusted to $74.4 million to reflect current labor rates.

A couple things are interesting to me. One is that the protests resulted in two contract extensions for SRA as the Military Sealift Command needed coverage for the networks and communications between its 170 ships and the Defense Department’s ashore command and control infrastructure.

The second was the acknowledgement in the command’s justification for an extension of the delays the protests caused. The command said that in the future it needs to account for such delays when it creates the timeline for its procurements.

So while GAO’s decision allows the new contract to move forward, the reality remains that bid protests slow things down. That’s a shame but probably inevitable.

You can look at bid protests a few different ways:

  • Protesters are sore losers.
  • Companies game the system to hang on to work they rightly lost.
  • Companies fight back because of agency procurement mistakes.

And guess what? I think all three of those are correct. You can find protests that fit any of those descriptions. But I’d also bet that the companies fighting back because they feel wronged are more common than the protestors who are sore losers or trying to game the system.

But that doesn’t mean that there aren’t problems with procurement, but the fix – more training and professional development and more people working contracts – will take years to have an impact.

Until then, bid protests remain a vital check and balance for a struggling procurement system.

Posted by Nick Wakeman on Aug 20, 2013 at 8:06 AM


Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts

  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Sequestration, LPTA and the Top 100

    Join Washington Technology’s Editor-in-Chief Nick Wakeman as he analyzes the annual Top 100 list and reveals critical insights into how market trends have impacted its composition. You'll learn what movements of individual companies means and how the market overall is being impacted by the current budget environment, how the Top 100 rankings reflect the major trends in the market today and how the biggest companies in the market are adapting to today’s competitive environment. Learn More!