SAIC pays $500M to settle CityTime scandal

Science Applications International Corp. will pay $500.4 million to settle criminal allegations involving its CityTime automated workforce management project with New York City.

The payment was announced today by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and the City of New York. SAIC will pay $500.4 million in restitution and penalties, and an independent monitor will be appointed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for three years to review certain company policies and practices, a March 14 company statement said.

“The United States Attorney’s Office has charged the company with a single criminal count related to CityTime, but will defer prosecution based upon, among other things, the company’s cooperation with the investigation, remediation efforts and acceptance of responsibility,” it said.

The government will dismiss the charge without prosecution in three years if SAIC complies with the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement.

“We welcome this settlement as an important step in our efforts to move forward as a better, stronger company dedicated to the highest standards of ethics and performance for our customers,” CEO John Jumper said in the statement.

“We have implemented strong improvements to our compliance program and have new leadership in place. Our financial position is solid, with a strong balance sheet and strong, predictable cash flow,” he said.

The SAIC statement concluded by explaining that “CityTime is an automated workforce management system that covers some 163,000 New York City employees in 65 agencies and that saves the city time and money every day."

SAIC last year  fired three key executives for alleged failures of proper management when the CityTime kickback scheme came to light.

The CityTime project, launched in 1998, was designed to update and streamline municipal employee records. But investigations by prosecutors, following a whistleblower’s tip, showed CityTime to be an international conspiracy with contractors earning kickbacks for inflated hours billed to the city. Two of those indicted in the scheme fled the country.

SAIC, of McLean, Va., ranks No. 6 on Washington Technology’s 2011 Top 100 list of the largest federal government contractors.

About the Author

David Hubler is the former print managing editor for GCN and senior editor for Washington Technology. He is freelance writer living in Annandale, Va.

Reader Comments

Fri, Mar 16, 2012 Greg Farrell San Diego

I agree with the individual who wrote in about using and off-the-shelf program. Besides Kronos, there are several tier 1 solutions which could have met the requirements document, for millions less. This makes me wonder more about the deals that were made between SAIC execs and the New York City stakeholders,than the payroll scandal itself. As I manage software implementations, this is very disturbing news.

Thu, Mar 15, 2012 Robert2 National Capital Region

Why don't you look where those three execs ended up? SRA hired Alderson right away and nobody questions their motives in doing so? Companies shouldn't be barred, the employees doing the wrong doing should be.

Thu, Mar 15, 2012 Kwame DC

March 15 commenter: please elucidate re the company being considered for sups/debar. Because of which alleged or proven wrongdoing. Nothing tends to stick to big companies nowadays, eh? No one ever goes to jail. At least in this case the co. disgorged half a bil.

Thu, Mar 15, 2012

Your last two sentences are correct, but most of the rest is wrong. Firing top execs does not indicate they played a role - or at least an active role. The company IS being considered for disbarment/suspension, but that descision does not arise from a City Attorney's office. Everyone known to be actively involved in this IS or HAS BEEN prosecuted. Etc. Etc. Etc.

Thu, Mar 15, 2012

Developing its own workforce automation system for hundreds of millions of dollars when there are commercial off the shelf systems that already do that (ex: Kronos and no, I don't work for kronos) is just ridiculous. Its why people don't trust the government. The people that proposed the project should be fired.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts

  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Sequestration, LPTA and the Top 100

    Join Washington Technology’s Editor-in-Chief Nick Wakeman as he analyzes the annual Top 100 list and reveals critical insights into how market trends have impacted its composition. You'll learn what movements of individual companies means and how the market overall is being impacted by the current budget environment, how the Top 100 rankings reflect the major trends in the market today and how the biggest companies in the market are adapting to today’s competitive environment. Learn More!