DHS scrutiny of services contracts draws flak

Some suspect ulterior motives

The Homeland Security Department’s new mandatory reviews of all professional services contracts worth more than $1 million are an attempt to address a longstanding, thorny issue, but some experts think there might be an underlying motive: aid the Obama administration's push to return many outsourced jobs to the government.

John Chierichella, a government contracts attorney at Sheppard Mullin Richter and Hampton law firm, said the department's effort strikes him as an attempt to create negative reports on contractors. During the past few years, the government pushed to reduce the federal workforce, a process accelerated by the George W. Bush administration. The government’s severe cuts to its acquisition staff created the need Obama sees to bring those jobs back in-house, Chierichella said.

DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano announced the reviews May 28 to identify inappropriate contracts for inherently governmental work. Historically, this has been an area ripe for reforms, according to experts in federal contracting.

“I think it is a wonderful idea,” said Scott Amey, general counsel for the Project on Government Oversight watchdog group. “But it will be very difficult.”

Identifying inherently governmental work requires a detailed look at the tasks that employees are performing, he said. “It is a fine line,” Amey said. “I think crossing the line happens more than we would expect.”

“The devil is in the definitions,” Chierichella said.

Napolitano said DHS will begin immediately conducting mandatory reviews of all new professional services contracts worth more than $1 million, including renewals of existing contracts. The aim is to ensure that contracts are not being awarded for inherently governmental functions, the jobs that only federal employees should perform.

The additional review "adds a new level of rigor to the DHS contracting process,” she said in a news release.

The new procedure is part of a workforce assessment to improve management, which is among several efficiency initiatives that began at DHS in March.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

Reader Comments

Tue, Jun 16, 2009 Jeffrey A. Williams

I believe that the Government taking back control and responsibility for many functions internally is a good idea. However deaminizing contracted agents or providers in order to effect such is not the way to go about doing such. This said, some if not many existing contracts as they become mature would be best either extended or revised and re-bid to outside contracts as the USG doesn't have the training or hiring ability to fill some if not many of those functions.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
 Top 100 Slideshow
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts