GAO cons SBA with HUBZone applications

Investigators for the Government Accountability
Office fooled the Small Business Administration
by applying for certification for four fake companies
under SBA's Historically Underutilized Business Zone program. SBA approved the applications
in short order.

Fictitious application 1: A virtual office

Investigators leased virtual office services from a
suite located in a HUBZone for $250 a month
and gave that address as the company's principal

The terms of the lease allowed the investigators
to schedule use of the office space for 16
hours a month and have mail delivered there.
Their HUBZone application also said the bogus
firm employed two people, one of whom lived in
a HUBZone.

Two business days after submitting the
application, an SBA official sent an e-mail
message requesting a copy of the lease for the
principal office's location and proof of the
employee's residency.

Investigators created the necessary documentation
by using publicly available hardware and
software and faxed copies to SBA. The agency
requested additional documentation related to
utility payments and canceled checks.

SBA officials requested no further information
and certified the company three weeks later.

Fictitious application 2: A $24 mailbox

This faux company's principal office was a mailbox
in a HUBZone and leased for less than $24 a

The application claimed the firm had nine
employees, four of whom lived in a HUBZone. SBA
requested clarification regarding a discrepancy in
the application information, and officials made no
further contact.

Four weeks after GAO investigators submitted
the fictitious application, SBA certified the fictional
company to participate in the HUBZone

Fictitious application 3: Starbucks coffee shop

For the principal office address, investigators
used a Starbucks coffee shop in a HUBZone. They
also wrote that the firm employed two people,
one of whom lived in the zone.

SBA did not request any supporting documentation
or explanation. Investigators received
HUBZone certification two weeks later.

Fictitious application 4: A $10 mailbox

Investigators used the address of a mailbox located
in a HUBZone for the principal office. They
paid less than $10 a month in rent.

In their application, the investigators said two
of the three employees who worked for the
bogus company lived in a HUBZone. SBA
requested clarification regarding a discrepancy
in the application information and made no further

The agency certified the invented company
about five weeks later.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
contracts DB


  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More


  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Sequestration, LPTA and the Top 100

    Join Washington Technology’s Editor-in-Chief Nick Wakeman as he analyzes the annual Top 100 list and reveals critical insights into how market trends have impacted its composition. You'll learn what movements of individual companies means and how the market overall is being impacted by the current budget environment, how the Top 100 rankings reflect the major trends in the market today and how the biggest companies in the market are adapting to today’s competitive environment. Learn More!