FBI may put squeeze on SAIC

Senators propose refund for failed VCF project

The Senate's draft of the appropriations bill for the Justice Department and FBI would order the bureau to use "all means necessary" to try to recover funds from the vendor of its failed Virtual Case File project.

In an unusual action, according to several sources, the draft legislation (H.R. 5672), officially the Departments of Commerce and Justice, Science and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill, fiscal 2007, directs the bureau to retrieve as much as $104 million from the defaulted VCF contract.

FBI hired Science Applications International Corp. of San Diego in 2001 to build VCF, which was intended to create an investigative case management system. FBI pulled the plug in 2005 after realizing the system would not work.

A key sentence in the Senate report language for the bill reads: "The committee expects FBI to use all means necessary, including legal action, to recover all erroneous charges from the VCF contractor ... ."

The Senate's reference to "the VCF contractor" especially singles out SAIC.
FBI and SAIC both declined to comment on the legislation and related VCF matters.

Spending plans

If FBI could recover funds, the bill would direct the bureau to use the money on its current case management project, known as Sentinel.

The House version of the bill does not include a similar provision, so if the full Senate passes the bill with the language intact, the language still could be stripped out during the conference committee session between the two bodies.

If FBI were to take legal action to recover VCF funds, it would be stepping into a legal and political minefield, sources close to the project said.

For one thing, even after FBI had decided to scuttle the investigative case management system, SAIC recommended that the bureau should deploy VCF, and made detailed technical proposals on how it could be salvaged.

Another critical problem is that the bureau has accepted some responsibility for the demise of the VCF project. Sources close to the project said that some senior officials in place during its time, including Director Robert Mueller, still hold powerful jobs in the bureau, and their reputations could suffer if a public lawsuit or civil trial unveiled the details of their roles.

The Senate Appropriations Committee acknowledged FBI's role in bungling VCF, in report language attached to the bill: "The committee understands that FBI shares much of the burden for past IT failures."

One official involved in the VCF incident noted that federal contract law requires an agency that has canceled a project because of contractor default to try to recover the funds. "FBI did not carry out that obligation, because it never punishes its own," the official said.

The official said the real issue is why FBI did not try to get back the money from SAIC.

"The world's greatest investigative body slowed this down," the official said. "The answer is culpability of FBI officials who are still there. Mueller says he takes responsibility. I still think there is accountability and culpability."

A federal procurement law attorney said: "In general, when it terminates for default, the government has the same rights as a private party would in the event of a breach of contract" to recover misused funds.

However, what the government usually does is to assess excess reprocurement costs, the attorney said.

"In other words, it buys the same thing from someone else, and if it costs more, it charges the difference to the defaulted contractor," the attorney said.

The procurement attorney said he had not studied specific details of FBI's pact with SAIC, so he could not comment on how the general principles of federal contract law would apply to that matter.

FBI and SAIC both declined to comment on the legislation and related VCF matters.
Legislative analysts said the VCF fund recovery language was inserted at the behest of Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., who is the second most senior Republican member of the Appropriations subcommittee on commerce, justice and science.

Gregg's office did not respond to a detailed inquiry on the matter.

In addition to requiring FBI to get back the money it paid to SAIC, the bill imposed other restrictions on the bureau that reflected the committee's skepticism that the agency is capable of managing large software projects.

Wilson Dizard is a senior writer with Government Computer News. He can be reached at wdizard@postnewsweektech.com.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts

  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Sequestration, LPTA and the Top 100

    Join Washington Technology’s Editor-in-Chief Nick Wakeman as he analyzes the annual Top 100 list and reveals critical insights into how market trends have impacted its composition. You'll learn what movements of individual companies means and how the market overall is being impacted by the current budget environment, how the Top 100 rankings reflect the major trends in the market today and how the biggest companies in the market are adapting to today’s competitive environment. Learn More!