Open for anything: Loss of advocate doesn't stall push for standards

Government is in the midst of "a testing cauldron" for open architecture and standards, which may result "in a large-scale adoption after a five-year period." | Matt Miszewski, Wisconsin CIO.

Former Massachusetts CIO Peter Quinn

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

When Massachusetts CIO Peter Quinn resigned his post in December, citing political turmoil that threatened to derail the state's adoption of an open-standards format for software, the behind-the-scenes battle between open-standards advocates and proprietary vendors went public.

On one side sits Microsoft Corp. On the other side are open-standards advocates and vendors. They're fighting for fair competition that doesn't give Microsoft undue advantage because of what critics charge are the company's long-standing relationships with most state governments.

During his three-year tenure as Massachusetts's chief information officer, Quinn was a vocal advocate for open standards and freedom from proprietary software. While most states were dabbling quietly in open standards, Quinn and other Massachusetts officials announced they intended to make open standards an integral part of their IT strategy.

Analysts and industry officials said the public declaration went a long way toward advancing the use of open standards in state government.

Since taking over the reins of Massachusetts' IT division, Quinn's replacement, Bethann Pepoli, who was chief operating officer of the division, has voiced support for the state's effort to adopt the Enterprise Technical Reference Model, which Massachusetts released in September 2005.
The Enterprise Technical Reference Model borrows from the National Association of State CIOs Enterprise Architecture Toolkit and the federal government's Federal Enterprise Architecture. It provides an architectural framework to identify standards, specifications and technologies that support Massachusetts' computing environment.

Quinn couldn't be reached for comment.


Oasis in the storm

The model mandates that state offices, by January 2007, use the open-standard format called OpenDocument, which is managed by the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (Oasis).


Open-standards software is adaptable to shifts in need and functionality, advocates said. For example, it sets specifications for how a document is to be saved electronically to ensure accessibility. It also allows for future reverse engineering of software to open files through set standards.


Oasis' board comprises executives from companies that support open standards, including IBM Corp., Oracle Corp., SAP AG and Sun Microsystems Inc. The board also includes a Microsoft representative.


The software giant has heard the demand for open-standards software, and its next desktop operating system, Office 12, will be based on Extensible Markup Language.
"The expectation that systems will be able to talk to each other now and in the future is already a very significant customer demand," said Stuart McKee, Microsoft's national technology officer.


Microsoft met with Massachusetts officials to design a system that would comply with the state's open-standards mandate, which requires saving all files in OpenDocument format. The state rejected Microsoft's design, and chose OpenDocument for use in state agencies. That has Microsoft crying foul.


"What Massachusetts has done is created a thinly veiled procurement preference, and that is what we think is out of line," McKee said.

In response, Microsoft may have launched a campaign against Quinn and the state's OpenDocument format mandate, according to some government officials and industry sources.

"One of the prime people disagreeing [with Massachusetts' direction] would be Microsoft," said Matt Miszewski, Wisconsin CIO and NASCIO president. "I'm fairly sure there was some disagreement in other circles, but the most significant voice in that dissent was clearly Microsoft's."

Microsoft lodged its complaints with the state in writing, said Shawn McCarthy, a senior analyst for government IT with market research firm International Data Corp., Framingham, Mass.

Microsoft General Manager Alan Yates in September wrote a 15-page letter to the Massachusetts Executive Office of Administration and Finance, outlining Microsoft's concerns, McCarthy said.


"That letter was passed around quite a bit, and quoted both internally and externally," he said.


Corporate maneuvers

Without mentioning Microsoft by name, John Weathersby, executive director of the Open Source Software Institute, Oxford, Miss., said powerful corporate interests used their leverage to fight aggressively the state's initiative.

"It demonstrates the lengths to which some will go to try to slow the adoption of open standards within public sector IT environments," he said.

Whether or not the letter or lobbying led directly to Quinn's exit is anyone's guess. It's worth noting that several state investigations into Quinn's conduct were launched this fall in an attempt to get the state to revisit its choice of OpenDocument over Microsoft's Office 12, including one by the Massachusetts Senate for what it characterized as a lack of due process in the state's IT division.


"The companies and public groups with
an interest in OpenDocument formats will continue to fight." | Tom Rabon, Red Hat Inc.

Microsoft's McKee declined comment on those events, but said Quinn's resignation was a surprise. He also said that Microsoft might not be excluded from Massachusetts' open-standards business after all.

"The new interim CIO is crafting an additional policy," McKee said.

Pepoli, who declined an interview request, denied that such a change was occurring.

Massachusetts "is not 'crafting an additional policy' in regard to the OpenDocument initiative," Pepoli said in an e-mail. "We are proceeding with implementation of the OpenDocument Format standard."

But could Microsoft work within the OpenDocument standard? The company doesn't seem to think so but is unsure, McKee said. The two systems should be able to communicate with one another and exchange data, although that may require additional applications, McKee said.

"The word 'compatible' is kind of tricky," he said. "What they've asked for in their standard is that the default save-as must be in the ODF format. So what they've asked us to do is to have our product save into a format that, frankly, we feel is inferior."

The debate continues over whose standard will be adopted by most users in the next round of desktop software upgrades, but the wish of states to move toward open standards is not waning, Miszewski said. While states look to build service-oriented architectures, they will need open standards to enable all their systems to communicate.

"We're in the middle of a testing cauldron right now, in terms of service-oriented architecture and in regard to open standards," Miszewski said. "If that proves out and works well, I think you'll see a large-scale adoption after a five-year period."

Whatever the outcome in Massachusetts, the demand for open-standards products will remain strong, said Tom Rabon, executive vice president of corporate affairs for Linux software developer Red Hat Inc., Raleigh, N.C.

"This is not going away," Rabon said. "The companies and public groups that have an interest in OpenDocument formats will continue to fight."

Although Miszewski said he sees no legal entanglements in adopting open-standards software, the potential for eliminating competition in the procurement process could raise legal questions, he said.

"There are times when that will happen," he said, "but you need to clear that stuff up over time."

Issues surrounding open-standards adoption, as well as the tactics used against Quinn, could cause other state IT leaders to think twice before pushing for it, Weathersby said.

"This will intimidate some public sector IT leaders," he said. "But I also believe that it will inspire others to stand up and do what is in the best interest of their state."


Staff Writer Ethan Butterfield can be reached at ebutterfield@postnewsweektech.com.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts

  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Sequestration, LPTA and the Top 100

    Join Washington Technology’s Editor-in-Chief Nick Wakeman as he analyzes the annual Top 100 list and reveals critical insights into how market trends have impacted its composition. You'll learn what movements of individual companies means and how the market overall is being impacted by the current budget environment, how the Top 100 rankings reflect the major trends in the market today and how the biggest companies in the market are adapting to today’s competitive environment. Learn More!