Progress made on info sharing

Info sharing boosts contract opportunities

State and local governments will need to buy data mining and Web-crawling solutions to take advantage of the terrorist threat information the FBI and other federal agencies are making available, according to government and industry officials.

Government contractors also will find opportunities helping state and local customers unlock propriety systems and exchange threat information stored on federal databases using Extensible Markup Language, they said.

At the state level, Lockheed Martin Corp. hopes to provide federal-state information-sharing capabilities to an advanced Incident Management Information System it is developing under a four-year, $129 million contract with Pennsylvania State Police, said Terry Kees, vice president of homeland security systems for the Bethesda, Md., company.

Lockheed Martin is developing prototypes that would link state and federal intelligence operations and networks, she said.

"The law enforcement and intelligence communities have trouble working together because there are laws and policies that get in the way," Kees said. "So we have to create systems that address these issues."

At the regional level, Northrop Grumman Corp. of Los Angeles won an 18-month, $1.2 million contract from a consortium in Washington state's Puget Sound region to develop an information exchange system for state and local law enforcement agencies and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service. The contract is potentially worth $10 million over several years, the company said.

? William Welsh

While praising individual info-sharing efforts, Rep. Adam Putnam (R-Fla.) said "the initiatives do not necessarily integrate others into a truly national system and may inadvertently hamper information sharing for this reason."

J. Adam Fenster

There have been noticeable improvements to information sharing at all three levels of government, but "more work remains to be done," said Mark Zadra of the Florida Office of Statewide Intelligence.

J. Adam Fenster

But cities, states lag behind feds in gathering terrorist information


State and local governments want new interoperability standards and additional funding from the federal government to help them improve their ability to gather and analyze terrorist threat information.

Federal threat intelligence capabilities have improved dramatically since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, but similar functions at the state government level lag far behind. "There have been many mechanisms and protocols put into practice that have improved information sharing among all levels of government," said Mark Zadra, chief of investigations with the Florida Office of Statewide Intelligence.

"It's evident, however, that more work remains to be done."

Although a few states and large cities have built automated systems to boost their intelligence gathering and analytical capabilities, most have yet to retool their systems to effectively counter terrorist threats, according to government and industry officials.

Most state and local systems "aren't appropriate for the threat they are trying to counter now from terrorist organizations," said Bob Hickes, director of homeland security for state and local government with BearingPoint Inc. of McLean, Va.

To achieve capabilities comparable to their federal counterparts, state and local law enforcement and homeland security organizations want guidance in the form of national standards to build interoperable information sharing systems and grant assistance to build such systems.

"It's imperative that the federal government ensure that we not just build databases and systems, but that we require any [federally] funded system to meet a national standard for information sharing," Zadra said.

State and local governments must access terrorist threat information through multiple portals and databases, Zadra said. Instead, states want "single-query access" to pertinent and previously disparate data to fit together the puzzle pieces regarding terrorists and their organizations dispersed throughout the nation and the world, he said.

Zadra articulated this challenge last month at a hearing at which officials from all levels of government testified on information sharing. The hearing was before the House Government Reform Committee's subcommittee on technology, information policy, intergovernmental relations and the Census.

Subcommittee chairman Rep. Adam Putnam (R-Fla.) praised individual efforts by federal, state and city governments to share terrorist threat information, but said, "the initiatives do not necessarily integrate others into a truly national system and may inadvertently hamper information sharing for this reason."
The subcommittee might revisit the topic in hearings on related matters in September, said Ursula Wojciechowski, a subcommittee spokeswoman.

In the meantime, subcommittee staff will continue gathering information about the status of the networks and whether progress is being made toward integrating them, she said.

The federal government also needs to consolidate so-called watch lists into a uniform reporting system that state and local governments can use through one portal, said Jeff Vining, research vice president of intelligence for the market research firm Gartner Inc., Stamford, Conn.

At the same time, federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies must make sure the information they are passing to state and local governments is done in a consistent fashion, Hickes said.

In Pennsylvania, for example, half of the state and local law enforcement agencies get their intelligence information from the FBI's Philadelphia field office; the other half gets its information from the bureau's Pittsburgh office, he said.

"They need to sing from the same sheet of music," Hickes said.
BearingPoint is the contractor for the Pennsylvania Justice Network, a system that provides a real-time link among the FBI, state agencies with criminal justice responsibilities and various cities and counties.

State and local governments receive threat information through several systems, including the Homeland Security Information Network (HSIN), Regional Information Sharing Systems program and the FBI's Law Enforcement Online network, federal officials told the subcommittee.

[IMGCAP(2)]HSIN provides a secure but unclassified link to share real-time information with the 50 states and the nation's 50 largest urban areas, he said.

Before the end of the year, state and local recipients also will get classified information through HSIN, said Patrick Hughes, assistant secretary for information analysis with Homeland Security's Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection Directorate.

A drawback to HSIN is that it's being built from the top down by the federal government rather than from the bottom up, based on the needs of state and local stakeholders, Vining said. "The entire network was created without any state and local input, he said.

States are allowed to post their own leads and share information on possible terrorist activities through the Terrorist Threat Integration Center, a multi-agency initiative tasked with integrating and analyzing threat information.

State and local officials acknowledged that the federal government has made substantial progress toward establishing new mechanisms such as the Terrorist Threat Integration Center and protocols for information sharing. They applauded efforts by the FBI to collaborate with state and local government to thwart terrorist threats.

States are now getting a flood of information through FBI field offices around country, Zadra said.

"There is no doubt that we're receiving a tremendous amount of information we previously didn't receive," he said. "This is primarily because of enhanced information and working relationships with the FBI."

In the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks, the FBI has expedited security clearances to share classified information, expanded joint terrorism task forces to better share counterterrorism information and shared otherwise classified material with persons without clearance to receive such information on a need-to-know basis as allowed by executive order, Vining said. n

Staff Writer William Welsh can be reached at wwelsh@postnewsweektech.com.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts

  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Sequestration, LPTA and the Top 100

    Join Washington Technology’s Editor-in-Chief Nick Wakeman as he analyzes the annual Top 100 list and reveals critical insights into how market trends have impacted its composition. You'll learn what movements of individual companies means and how the market overall is being impacted by the current budget environment, how the Top 100 rankings reflect the major trends in the market today and how the biggest companies in the market are adapting to today’s competitive environment. Learn More!