Vendors face performance, small-biz goals on Alliant

Alliant contract breakdown


  • 15-year contract, five years with two five-year options

  • $150 billion ceiling

  • 20 prime contractors. Twenty-five percent of the awards are reserved for small businesses or teams of small businesses.

  • 30 percent to 40 percent small-business subcontracting goals for large businesses

  • 11 industry areas covered: computer systems design, custom programming, facilities management, training, data processing and hosting, satellite telecommunications, other telecommunications, Internet service providers, cybersecurity, Web search portals and other computer-related services

  • June request for proposals expected

  • September deadline for bids

  • May 2005 GSA will award the contracts

  • 800 proposals expected by GSA

  • Feb. 18 and March 29, industry days in Oakland, Calif., and Washington, respectively

  • Web site: www.gsa.gov/alliant


Get it right or get out -- that's the message to vendors from GSA's Federal Technology Service on the upcoming $150 billion Alliant governmentwide acquisition contract.

Bill Archambeault, a General Services Administration senior contracting officer in charge of Alliant, earlier this month said FTS will do a better job of making sure companies meet the goals established in the contract and satisfy agency requirements.

"After the first five years and every two years after that, we will decide how companies are performing. If they are not, we will kick them off," he said at an event hosted by the Industry Advisory Council. "During open season, we will replace companies that are kicked off, so we keep the number of prime contractors constant."

GSA will merge some or all of the requirements for six technology GWACS into the Alliant contract. Those GWACS are Access Certificates for Electronic Services, Applications 'N Support for Widely Diverse End-User Requirements (Answer), Disaster Recovery, Millennia, Safeguard and Virtual Data Center.

"We thought these services still were necessary, so we included them in the contract," Archambeault said. "We still need the Office of Management and Budget to approve our business case, but my intent is to do it this way."

Within the next few weeks, GSA will submit to OMB the business case for the 15-year contract. GSA plans to release a pre-solicitation notice later this month.

The concept of merging some of the GWACs first came from a recommendation by a special contract review board. It had suggested the agency consider combining Answer and Millennia and letting eight other multiple award contracts expire.

"My intent is to make this a performance-based contract with a maximum participation of small businesses," Archambeault said.

"For now, we are taking a monolithic approach to the contract, where each awardee will be expected to fulfill the entire scope of the contract," he said. "But we are putting together a tiered approach if OMB wants a contract where industry partners can bid on certain parts of the contract they have an expertise in."

Archambeault said he expects to award 15 contracts to large businesses and five to coalitions of small businesses. A coalition could be as few as two small companies. He said GSA will view them as joint ventures rather than teams.

GSA also will scrutinize how much work large businesses subcontract to small ones. Large firms will have subcontracting goals of at least 30 percent to 40 percent, he said. "We recognize we have not monitored the plans well in the past," Archambeault said. "The oversight for Alliant will be better."

GSA also will put in place procedures to monitor contract bundling and to make sure agencies receive enough competitive proposals for each task order.

GSA's plans call for releasing the request for proposals by June, accepting bids until September and awarding contracts in May 2005. Because GSA expects to receive more than 800 proposals, Archambeault said the agency will identify the strongest bids and ask finalists for oral presentations.

"I tried to pick an award date that is the middle of all expiring contracts," Archambeault said. "The board said when the contracts expire, they expire; but we still need those services, so I wanted to get this out as early as possible."

Jason Miller is a staff writer with Government Computer News. He can be reached at jmiller@postnewsweektech.com.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts

  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Sequestration, LPTA and the Top 100

    Join Washington Technology’s Editor-in-Chief Nick Wakeman as he analyzes the annual Top 100 list and reveals critical insights into how market trends have impacted its composition. You'll learn what movements of individual companies means and how the market overall is being impacted by the current budget environment, how the Top 100 rankings reflect the major trends in the market today and how the biggest companies in the market are adapting to today’s competitive environment. Learn More!